Thinkin'
'Bout the Payback
Here's a little
ethical problem: When you were born, you received a stock
portfolio and ever since, you receive a monthly deposit
into your bank account. However, the company that sends
you these checks does business unfairly and acts in ways
you find reprehensible. You cannot sell your interest
in this company, and even as you denounce them your bank
account continues to swell.
Such is the
situation I find myself in as a Straight White Male.
Relaxing comfortably in my throne at the top of the
societal power pyramid, I can assess my position of
privilege -- not in the guilt-ridden frenzy that many
will accuse me of, but rather an acknowledgment of how
I benefit from the current existing order.
Currently
there's a backlash against demonization of the SWM.
It's not that difficult to see why. It's frustrating
for SWM's who have fought against the status quo all
their lives to be suddenly lumped in with the enemy,
to be told that their contribution is no longer valid.
And so polarizing politics serve to divide people involved
in complex struggles and interpersonal relationships
into teams with US and THEM on the jerseys.
A large amount
of this frustration comes from the emphasis on history
and guilt. Revisionism is a necessary and empowering
first step. Re-evaluating the Discovery of the New World
as a military invasion is valuable not only in understanding
the continuing injustice visited on Turtle Island's
indigenous peoples, but also in revealing how powerful
propaganda is in repressing dissenting perspectives.
A certain
amount of European-bashing is understandable, even desirable.
The elevation of the African at the expense of the European
is a perspective that can serve to counterbalance our
society's current Eurocentric perspective. This is the
positive spin to groups like the Nation of Islam. Ideally,
no heritage would be raised above another -- practically,
it serves as a source of self-esteem and emotional support.
SWM's have
lived a life where their S-ness, W-ness and M-ness has
been consistently accepted as supreme through subtle
and blatant means too many to catalogue. Still, many
of this class are willing to question this supremacy
-- but few are willing to accept inferiority, even within
the bubble of radical circles, even if it is in the
interest of balancing the scales a bit. So we're at
a point where radicals and conservatives alike mutter
bitterly about the bum rap they're getting.
This is not
a new phenomenon (Minor Threat sung "Guilty of being
White" about a decade back) but it's one that is starting,
like a shark fin, to be sighted quite often in the socio-political
main stream. Certain egomaniacs like myself have developed
a confidence base fairly independent of origin or status
(though if you mock my fine taste in curtains I tend
to break down). So, while I feel no more guilty for
what my long-dead ancestors did than for what nasty
things my father has done, there is a feeling of responsibility.
Not for what they did -- but for how I personally have
benefited from what they did. They established a system
that is prejudiced towards my race, my gender and sexual
orientation. So my responsibility is to smash that prejudice
like an ugly vase.
It's a hard
thing to accept that all the breaks we get aren't due
to merit, or luck, but instead thanks to a system that
fucks over others for our sake. Because then you start
to see that we have a debt. That all of those privileges,
perks, advantages that the Company put into our bank
accounts were stolen from someone else.
I take immense
enjoyment in walking alone at night. If I was a woman,
I could not. What would I pay, in hard cash, for such
a privilege? A friend tells me of how many stores he
goes into give him "special attention" due to his being
Jamaican. How much would he pay to escape such degrading
treatment? How much would a gay man pay to be able to
safely kiss his lover in public as the fancy took him?
William Upski,
in his excellent book on graffiti, race theory and hip
hop Bomb the Suburbs, likens the invisible power
of privilege to wind in this analogy: a cyclist rides
with the wind always at his back. When he sees another
cyclist coming towards him (and against the wind) he
doesn't understand why he's having so much trouble,
and chalks it up to the other's weakness or his comparative
strength.
It's not
enough to pass a water bottle off to the cyclist as
we pass. We've got to work against the very weather
-- we've got to change the climate so that the wind
itself is stilled. It's taken me a while to recognize
that I am a part of the straight white male community.
I can claim to be different, to be a punk, an anarchist
-- but I still get the check, from the same Company
that those rich, bloated, corrupt assholes-stuffed-into-suits
belong to, and it's signed in suspiciously blotted red
ink.
TIPS FOR
CONSCIOUS WHITE BOYS
1. BE AWARE
OF YOUR PREDISPOSITION TOWARDS POWER. 'Cause basically,
we're bred to do just that -- become the ruling class.
Like stupid water bison, we're socially engineered to
use the tools of domination and aggression to get the
positive reinforcement every human needs. So when you're
arguing a point, make sure it's serving a purpose and
not just to Win. And regardless of how excellent a strategist
and orator you are, it's not your place (yes, I realize
what that sounds like) to serve on the board of the
Afrikan Defense League -- the damage to morale alone
immediately cancels out any contribution you can make.
In most cases, taking a position of power in a radical
group is regressive -- it's a retelling of the SWM-as-boss-savior-god
story that's caused so many of the problems in the first
place.
2. DEAL WITH
YOUR OWN SHIT, FIRST. Before you start dissing hip hop
(and by extension the black community) for its misogyny,
consider this (admittedly simplistic) theory: the black
man is emasculated by the white man in a thousand daily
power plays. Depoliticised, he turns his anger on the
closest, most vulnerable target -- his women. So it's
our community, the SWMs, who are the source and thus
to blame. But within radical circles, it becomes easy
to forget this source, and when the people we're struggling
for show signs of imperfection we shake our heads in
bewilderment, saying things like, "You'd think they
would be the last ones to do that kind of thing." Ignoring
the problems of struggling peoples is as misguided as
romanticizing them, but it's not your place to blow
the whistle. Criticism must come from within to be acceptable
and effective, and you're not "within" regardless of
your commitment. You've got contributions to make in
critiquing and educating your own community -- since
you're practically immune from accusations of self-interest.
3. LISTEN
TO ME AND NEVER DEVIATE FROM THESE RULES. I've been
involved in activist stuff for almost two years now,
so everything I say is pretty much carved in the Stone
of Ages. Nothing is up for discussion and a sharing
of experience is futile, since I've already figured
everything out.
|